Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sovereign Grace Advent Testimony


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 09:38, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Sovereign Grace Advent Testimony

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently not notable. A Google search found no useful 3rd-party sources, and no news coverage. The organization seems to have published a few pamphlets (according to a google books search) and some of them have been footnoted in other published books, but I find no actual discussion of even those pamphlets, much less the organization as such. A Notability tag was placed and removed without fixing the issues (although the creator may have honestly believed they were fixed, not fully understanding Wikipedia Policy on such matters). Currently no cited sources except the group's own web page. Does not appear to pass WP:ORG or WP:GNG. This page should be deleted unless proper sources can be found. DES (talk) 17:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep -- a small religious publisher that has been going for nearly a century seems worth having an article on. Keeping the works of people like Muller and Spurgeon in print is useful work.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 16:38, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.