Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sovereign House of Nicaea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Sovereign House of Nicaea

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I'm not sure that this House exists outside the imagination of a few people. In particular, Google has never heard of the "Sovereign House of Nicaea" and the article contains no references to sources discussing the house. The refs, if we can call them refs, are excerpts of various documents that support the idea that the House of Nicea collects the inheritance of the Empire of Nicaea but don't provide anything like third-party significant coverage of the house. Pichpich (talk) 22:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Articles for deletion/Marquess of Ephesus. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 06:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the revision @Pichpich! I apologize for being new to WP, therefore I didn't know how to properly sustain the article with sources that DO NOT raise doubts on the existence of the House. I really need your support and guidance to avoid deletion, as the aim of this page is to respect the purpose first and foremost, and to provide people knowledge about this institution.
 * My question is: would an article (in English), a document, written by the "Consiglio Araldico Italiano" (Italian Heraldic Council, you'll find many references on Google) be deemed as a reliablie source, since it is a subject matter expert third party on the claim? The Council has edited books in the past, too . Moreover, how much time do I have before you really need to complete deletion? Marchio Ephesi (talk) 08:01, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion debates are open for at least a week. If there's no clear consensus on what to do with the article or there hasn't been sufficient participation in the discussion, the debates can be extended. If there's still no consensus to delete, the articles are kept by default, although they can be resubmitted for deletion after some time has elapsed. Pichpich (talk) 23:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete as fanboy nonsense. Mccapra (talk) 10:41, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass GNG.★Trekker (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.