Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soverns' Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Tone 21:17, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Soverns' Law
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article seems to be about a recent (August 14) in-forum joke. Non-notable and definitely not encyclopaedic. X X X antiuser 17:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Is referenced.  Torkmann (talk) 17:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No it isn't, the only "reference" in the article is a link to a password-protected forum. The "Law" was created today, this can't possibly be notable. X X X antiuser 17:59, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete- Last I checked, we're still not for stuff made up one day. Given that the article cites today (8-14-09) as the the day it was first used, I have a hard time believing this is anything else. Umbralcorax (talk) 18:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:MADEUP. Bearian (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Is WP:MADEUP a criterion for speedy deletion? I looked at WP:CSD and couldn't find something that matched, hence the AfD. Do let me know if this could've been handled differently. X X X antiuser 18:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. Made-up stuff counts as hoax/vandalism, as far as I'm concerned, and should be speediable as G-3. (Antiuser, I'm interested in these procedural matters also.) Drmies (talk) 20:02, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.