Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpaceGhostPurrp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

SpaceGhostPurrp

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

It is a recreation of Spaceghostpurrp article that was deleted, only difference is title style/caps. Dan56 (talk) 01:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note to admin: you might want to salt this if it's deleted, to avoid further recreations of the article under this name.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Additional. Admins might want to take a look at this user: User:SpaceghostpurrpTokyogirl79 (talk) 09:23, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 01:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep While the article requires proper sourcing, this artist has received plenty of coverage in the music press, especially since signing to 4AD records. Here is a biography at Allmusic, there are two album reviews at Pitchfork, another at Spin, more at NME, and a total of 19 reviews listed at Metacritic. He even made a feature on Rolling Stone. Meets WP:MUSIC, quite easily. — sparklism  hey! 09:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I think it's kind of amusing that the major coverage in Spin is in their "worst new music" section. In any case, I guess you can be notably bad.  The article should reflect the coverage, however, and shouldn't be overly praising in nature. Gigs (talk) 13:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Metacritic lists 19 album reviews for this artist. Additional coverage exists (e.g., ). Subject meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO.  Gongshow  Talk 15:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.