Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpaceX Crew-3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep since article clearly passes WP:CRYSTAL and WP:GNG as well (the most common reason why an article may be nominated is if it fails GNG). If it happens, it will happen. (non-admin closure) JTZegers Speak Aura 14:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

SpaceX Crew-3

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:CRYSTAL Alexandermcnabb (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Author: Quite funny, since I just finished editing the article, 5 minutes before your marked for deletion. NO possible time for you to READ and DIGEST (Think).  In your own words from your page: “I'm useless at source editing ...”. Then WHY are you here?  I held off submission, until sufficient citations (sources) existed.  Some of these citations are now 6 weeks old, I added the Twitter citation/reference (from ESA) — it is not single source.  Aware Wikipedia frowns on Twitter sources. OTHER Wikipedia space articles have the information presented, in this article, some with citations and others without (you must have missed those). Beatgr (talk) 16:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:CRYSTAL criteria. Beatgr (talk) 16:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:CRYSTAL Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place – The mission is definitely notable, it is scheduled to take place just 10 months from now, and the page is backed by suitable citations. Nuff said. Rosbif73 (talk) 16:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: because clearly this article is about an upcoming mission, and with be recreated in the future.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.250.61 (talk) 21:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rosbif73.  --Patriccck (talk) 18:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Mission will happen, less than one year from now and the crew is known. Hektor (talk) 18:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep but remove unreferenced (or reference it) and wrong informations. Examples: There is no information about this mission in Clark Stephens Launch Schedule, I don't found any reference to the first 3 Crew members, I don't found any information about Crew Dragon Resilience will be used (see also Axiom Space-1 in SpaceX Dragon 2), ... Barny22 (talk) 20:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * This discussion is only about whether or not the article should exist. Potential improvements should be discussed on the article's talk page. Rosbif73 (talk) 10:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That was placeholder (SpaceflightNow, Launch Schedule). Typically they do not post until on Eastern Range calendar. Beatgr (talk) 20:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Aura 14:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:CRYSTAL and is most certainly notable. There is literally no reason to delete it. Ultimograph5 (talk) 00:00, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, we have always had future crewed missions given their own articles. This flight is in the manifest and will be launching. Zerbey (talk) 14:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, "Fails WP:CRYSTAL" my butt. Passes and also passes WP:GNG. Kill two birds with one stone. JTZegers Speak
 * We all make mistakes, as the Dalek said climbing off the dustbin. Do feel free to close, no objections from my side, consensus is clearly keep. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.