Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Cat (music)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete - fails notability. Avi 06:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Space Cat (music)

 * — (View AfD)

This is confusing. It's an article about two different musicians - both apparently non-notable - yet not. Of the records covered, nobody's created them; one label is a label catering mostly to Olympia, WA, the other is a movie from 1985. Google turns up something of the techno film, but nothing more apparent than possible club notability. Dennisthe2 04:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete The former is actually a reasonably prolific record producer. If you use his real name rather than the "Space Cat" name he's got a comprehensive listing at Discogs, with plenty of releases under his listed pseudonyms as well.  I can't find anything that pushes him over the keep line though. One Night In Hackney 12:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps a merge and redirect to his real name would be in order then. Still, I'll leave it to concensus.  --Dennisthe2 23:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Herostratus 06:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable. Xiner (talk, email) 19:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep don't know about the American guy, but the Israeli is one of the Israeli pioneers of Goa trance. Psychomelodic 22:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep too The israeli guy Is pretty widely known, he has done some nice stuff with big names of trance, like Infected mushrooms for example, It's not because you don't know about him that noone does... Okay, Not a very widely star but he sure passed the club phase.... And no, even if google knows a lot of stuff, it doesn't know everything. I'll just add that not everything is on internet and that wikipedia should overcome simple digital world... It's an "encyclopedia on internet", not an "encyclopedia of internet" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.38.238.66 (talk) 00:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.