Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Force One (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Transportation of the President of the United States. Closing this early as the last AfD was closed only a couple of weeks ago. Clear consensus here and there that this shouldn't exist. I'm not going to full-protect just yet, but if anyone sees it be recreated in this or similar form, ping me and I will deal with more strongly. Daniel (talk) 03:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Space Force One
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-existing call sign (it has never been used), no mention in reliable sources. Clear case of WP:CRYSTALBALL. The article was already deleted once when the article was in more or less the same state. See Articles for deletion/Space Force One lovkal (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. lovkal (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. lovkal (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. lovkal (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I might add that I support redirecting Space Force One to Transportation of the President of the United States. lovkal (talk) 15:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - there was very clear consensus that this isn't notable at the AfD last month. Has anything changed since then? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:51, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I cannot find a single mention of "Space Force One" in the context of a military call-sign on Google. The previous article on Space Force One relied on an FCC order that stipulates that any military aircraft carrying POTUS is assigned the call sign followed by One, but the order never explicitly mentions Space Force One. lovkal (talk) 15:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Correction - I meant FAA, not FCC. 46.162.75.56 (talk) 16:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC) lovkal (talk) 16:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete absolutely nothing has changed since the last time we deleted this druk.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Transportation of the President of the United States again. Clear consensus in the previous AfD on this and it doesn't look like anything has changed. Also please consider protecting the article to stop this AfD from needing to be repeated ad nauseam Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing has changed since the AFD a month ago, which was a pretty unanimous call for deletion. Restoring the Redirect would be fine as well, but seeing as there are zero sources actually mentioning or discussing the topic, I would think it would currently be more appropriate to remove the reference to the term from the Transportation of the president of the United States article and deleting this one.  Regardless, though, this should not remain as an independent article and should be protected to keep it from being restored again.  Rorshacma (talk) 22:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG, no justification for it being recreated after earlier AFD. Mztourist (talk) 03:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.