Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Is For Stars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Seraphim&hearts; Whipp  00:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Space Is For Stars

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The CSD for the article was declined, but I still believe the band is not a notable one. The author, defending the speedy, claimed on the talk page that they are a) independent and b) have a rapidly growing fan base; going against both WP:MUSIC and WP:CRYSTAL. That is why I suggest the article be deleted.  weburiedoursecrets inthegarden  20:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * delete - does not meet WP:MUSIC. Napsterbater (talk) 21:11, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 22:03, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is fairly cut and dry. are some ghits. Mostly myspace and other non-noteworthy sites. Also, some news: . One hit, and it looks like a list with merely a fleeting mention of the band. This fails WP:MUSIC.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 22:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, which the nominator originally (and correctly, IMHO) did after my tagging. This is yet another unsigned, non-notable local band that happened to have one article written about it in a local nightlife magazine/website. Fails WP:BAND badly. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 15:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.