Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Marine: The Guardians


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Space Marine: The Guardians

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article on a fictional topic. appears to be made up by various anonymous IP addresses, a search for the any of the 'characters' turns up nothing. Wongm (talk) 00:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete nn, hopeless essay/game guide. JJL (talk) 00:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I can't even make out the context for this. Is it Warhammer 40,000? or what? —Quasirandom (talk) 00:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. They're army lists (i.e, what miniatures you have in your army) for 40k.  Celarnor Talk to me  01:32, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

This is poor material written by a drooling fanboy trying to spread his foul ill concieved seed across the internet. DELETE IT! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.68.120.148 (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Good army list. :P Not good for Wikipedia, though.  :P Celarnor Talk to me  01:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fan-created materials for what looks like a local-level gaming group's campaign. No sources to demonstrate the importance of this campaign and associated fluff to the greater world, and I would be suprised if multiple reliable sources could be provided. (Not to codexes or published materials confirming the contents of the army lists... it needs multiple news articles and reviews of the campaign itself). -- saberwyn 02:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - not useful, maybe merge some information with List of Chaos Space Marines and Warhammer 40,000..-- Cometstyles 10:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete first line is "The Guardians These are pretty much unknown." oops. It's 40K related alright - but it doesn't look like canon (or anything remotely approaching) to me. If it was, it should be in the warhammer article and even then would probably end up being copyright material. I can see no reason to keep this one I'm afraid BananaFiend (talk) 10:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You're right. It isn't anything remotely approaching canon. -- saberwyn 10:58, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT Percy Snoodle (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this definitely isn't Warhammer 40,000 canon, seems to be an invented army list idea Lord Foppington (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - non-notable. Dreamspy (talk) 18:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Can someone speedy delete this, please? (per WP:MADEUP.) I think we've got consensus here... Terraxos (talk) 02:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not seem to appear in any GW publication. Must be a fan made chapter which is not suitable for Wiki. Symos —Preceding comment was added at 12:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. In the name of the Emperor, purge with fire!  (As non-notable and made-up.)  --Craw-daddy | T | 23:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.