Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Quest Omnipedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. --Tito xd (?!? - help us) 07:42, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Space Quest Omnipedia
NN wiki. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:WEB. Alexa Ranking: 1,098,681. &mdash; The Hooded Man &#9795;&#9794; 03:13, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It seems the nominator has not investigated any of these wikis, judging by later nominations, and I have not had time to do so. I agree with JJay that there may be more merit than an Alexa rating may provide.  &mdash; The Hooded Man &#9795;&#9794; 03:19, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Like what? WP:WEB is the ONLY thing that should apply. That and the main page has less than 5000 hits and there are less than 1000 articles.  This is a joke.  If we have a standard and then ignore it for no discernable reason, what is the point?  --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. -- JJay 03:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Why? --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 08:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Why not? It seems unique. How many other wikis focus on Space Quest? At the very least, the info should be merged to one of our space quest pages. -- JJay 09:47, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Space Quest Omnipedia is currently one of the links on the Space Quest page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin Kimbrell (talk • contribs) 22:20, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Good work and thanks. I guess if the nom had merged and redirected it would have eliminated the need for this vote. -- JJay 22:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Being a wiki does not procure notability. --Apostrophe 05:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - A site's use of MediaWiki is irrelevant in determining notability. FCYTravis 06:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * As a passionate Space Quest lover, I am glad that I have discovered this website exists. That doesn't mean the website is encyclopaedic, of course! Delete, completely unremarkable. It is merely a wiki, not the Space Quest community's oldest and most cherished site or anything (that would probably be the Virtual Broomcloset...it's the oldest, anyway). Lord Bob 13:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly fails to meet WP:WEB in any way. Agnte 20:35, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:WEB is just a guideline by which some but by no means all Wikipedians choose to operate. The site exists and is verifiable. Jcuk 21:44, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn. mikka (t) 23:43, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Existance and verifiability are not, by themselves, grounds for inclusion, especially in the case of webpages. It deserves an external link at Space Quest, but that's it. -Sean Curtin 06:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * delete nn .  Grue   14:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.