Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Tourism Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:37, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Space Tourism Society

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable and reads as a promotion. -- Navy Blue84  01:04, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I cannot find anything beyond blogs, forums and primary sources; no notability is established. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:40, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: In addition to the very low level of participation in this discussion, the author of the article was not informed of the discussion.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JamesBWatson (talk) 00:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - Although the article needs a complete rewrite, the subject organization is WP:N via inclusion in third-party books (google book search found several), and the founder of the org is frequently quoted by mainstream press on space tourism topics. I will drop a few of the references on the article talk page for later use after AfD. --Tgeairn (talk) 01:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:50, 29 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge or delete. I'm not seeing sufficient coverage here to demonstrate that this is a notable organisation in its own right, but I think a brief description of it in the Space tourism article can be justified. (Indeed, it is already mentioned there, alongside various other organisations.) Robofish (talk) 11:42, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.