Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Trek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Space Trek

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. A movie in production. May be released in 2011. 'Nuff said. Delete. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 02:18, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete A possible hoax or crystal ball. A google search turned up no relevent hits. Tavix (talk) 02:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep not a hoax, probably just keeping most secret. Da bomba3 (talk) 02:22, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I think it it obvious this movie will be released. Illays (talk) 02:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * — Illays (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Dekisugi (talk) 02:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Dekisugi (talk) 02:26, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. JJL (talk) 02:28, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, it's real! I'm a cast member!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Therealzezima (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * — Therealzezima (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Dekisugi (talk) 02:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep' Hello, I am one of the directors of Space Trek and I must say that this film is real. Also, Therealzezima, which cast member are you? I wan't aware any cast members had a wikipedia account. Spacetrekdirector (talk) 02:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * — Spacetrekdirector (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Dekisugi (talk) 02:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment' I am Hebert Wanzalot. Therealzezima (talk) 02:44, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. That you were unaware of that would be because the account was created just minutes ago. Here is the account creation log. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 02:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable future film, no proof that it even exists yet. And please, somebody remove these socks. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:20, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Gosh, isn't it interesting how both a cast member and the director joined the discussion so quickly? I think we should nominate Star Wars for deletion so that we can hear from George Lucas and Harrison Ford.  Mandsford (talk) 03:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, maybe Speedy' No sources, no proof of notability, no proof that the movie even exists.  TJ   Spyke   03:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep To Pursue Wikiality - I'm kidding. We should delete this. This is clearly a hoax. I found no official source verifying a movie called "Space Trek" starring Shatner, and all the people posting keep look to be sock puppets. Nlm1515 (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources. No proof. No movie. No dice. DarkAudit (talk) 04:51, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete dumb. JuJube (talk) 06:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:CRYSTAL Andante1980 (talk) 07:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. At best this is crystal balling, at worst it's just a hoax. PC78 (talk) 12:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete no WP:RS, possible hoax.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No content, probable hoax, no sources. The IMDb doesn't even list this thing and they'll list anything. 23skidoo (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete either a hoax or non-notable not-made-yet fan film. Oh, and block the socks.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * CommentWhat does sock mean? Also, I'm pretty sure the reason IMDb doesn't list this is it hasn't been announced, why i heard of it from an anonymous e-mail, and that person(s) told me to make the Wikipedia article. Oh, and Nlm1515, the article says that they are trying to get Shatner. It doesn't say he's in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Da bomba3 (talk • contribs) 22:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * "Sock" is a reference to | sock puppet, which is a Wikipedia convention describing someone having more than one username, and posting comments under more than one name. I'm sure someone can explain this better than I, but suffice to say that the management has ways of spotting such things (how they can spot it is not as important as the fact that they are able to spot it), and they can ban any user as they see fit.  There's a process for getting them to reconsider if a person feels that they have been banned unjustly.  The best thing to do, however, is to not make waves until you have been established for awhile.  It's their show.  Posting on Wikipedia is a privilege, not a right.  Mandsford (talk) 23:36, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Director and cast, please read WP:NFF. You are welcome to come back and create a WP article after your film has been released and/or reviewed. Bm gub (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That's a good suggestion. Delete for now, and re-create the article when a recognized distributor announces that Space Trek is going to a DVD or theatre release.  You'll have more verified information at that time, for sure. Mandsford (talk) 04:51, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Crystal Ball-ing, and I'd think the PC DOS game would be a more likely search target. REDIRECT to Star Trek as a likely misunderstanding. 132.205.44.5 (talk) 22:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.