Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Charleston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 16:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Charleston

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

advert? Ultra! 21:03, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment it's not written clearly but are gov't contractors notable? There appears to be RS coverage. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 21:32, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's not a contractor, it's a U.S. Navy organization. We can discuss whether the organization is sufficiently notable to have its own article, but since the nominator did not challenge the article on this ground, I'll wait to see if that truly is at issue. Just for comparison, here's the article for an equivalent organization. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  21:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.   —Xymmax  So let it be written   So let it be done  21:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment thanks for clarifying. I'm not too familiar with military orgs. The article does have a promotional tone but I think it can be re-wrotten based on what I found by someone who understands their role and function. I tried but their website confused me. So yes, my !vote is keep based on the info provided by Xymmax. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 00:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Military installation/organization, automatically notable. MrPrada (talk) 22:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, but the article could use some clean up and additional references. Happyme22 (talk) 23:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite to make NPOV and remove the promotional language. As it stands the article reads like an advertisement. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.