Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space logistics (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. Article still needs work. Shouldn't exist in this state. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timneu22 (talk • contribs)

Space logistics
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Second nomination. Previous AfD (almost two years old) result was keep, with one comment to "Keep ...and then do some work on it to improve the article to a reasonable standard". As one can see, there have been no improvements here. The topic may be worth an article, but a rewrite from here seems out of the question. The community would be better off with this as a red link than to try to make something out of what currently exists. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 17:48, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. If you think the topic is worth an article, why bring it to AfD? Erpert (let's talk about it) 18:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I note the previous AfD was a unanimous keep and even the nominator here seems to believe the subject is notable. As one of those commenting said, ironically in reply to this AfD's nominator, AFD is supposed to decide on the topic of an article, not the article in its current state, with a reference to WP:DELETION, which states, "if the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion." There is no doubt that this article needs a rewrite but that on its own is not sufficient justification to delete. If poor articles should be deleted, then we should delete every stub article. We don't delete them and we shouldn't delete this one. --AussieLegend (talk) 18:44, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * It's been 20 months. No improvement, and nothing worth keeping. Delete it. If it needs to exist in the future, someone can start from scratch. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 19:01, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Timneu22's trying to use AfD as cleanup.— S Marshall  T/C 19:29, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Bad faith nomination. Same nominator tries to delete it previously, everyone other editor says "keep" but them.  Don't just keep nominating something until you get the results that you want.  The subject is notable, and if you have a problem with the article then fix it yourself.  Stop trying to delete things simply because you can't get others to do the work for you.   D r e a m Focus  22:14, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Bad faith comment. I don't have any knowledge of this article, and I just noticed it on my watch list. Don't just keep nominating until you get the results you want. That's an awful accusatory comment considering I nominated this article once, 20 months ago. I do not appreciate it. The fact is that this article still has no reason to belong on Wikipedia. Only the title makes sense, the rest of it fails anything and everything related to standards and criteria. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 22:27, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.