Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spaceman Spiff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Spaceman Spiff
This and all other comic stubs are much too insignificant to be listed in their own article. There is already a description of Spaceman Spiff in the Calvin and Hobbes article.--FelineFanatic13 14:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge any necessary info with Calvin and Hobbes and leave it as a redirect. PJM 14:20, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. --Doc ask? 16:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep good approach to Spaceman, Calvin and Hobbes article too long for merge. -- JJay 16:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable recurring alter ego, well-sourced article. Calvin and Hobbes is already "64 kilobytes long. This may be longer than is preferable". Kappa 16:44, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - anyone who deletes Calvin & Hobbes had no childhood. :-(  --Cyde Weys votetalk 18:02, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Spaceman Spiff article is really not a stub and Calvin and Hobbes article is too long for a merge. --AlainV 19:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per Cyde Weys. Watterson for life! FCYTravis 21:14, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to a List of Calvin alter-egos article along with Tracer Bullet and all of those others.  howch e  ng   {chat} 23:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Hands off Calvin & Hobbes. Flyboy Will 00:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Calvin and Hobbes is a bit long for a merge, otherwise I'd side with PJM on this. --Technogeek 06:56, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep concept is notable and content is big enough to justify separate article. ++Lar 15:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is quite a long article.  Keep it!  A link is fine; after all, how else did we find it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.124.163.150 (talk • contribs)
 * Keep. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 13:07, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.