Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spade Kitty Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:51, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Spade Kitty Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This minor record label has lots of what appear to be bluelinks, but turn out to point to unrelated articles, disambig pages or are just plain name-dropping. As far as I can tell, only two bands signed to this label have articles, and they are of questionable notability. In any case, WP:MUSIC is silent on labels, so this article should be deleted by the standards of WP:CORP. I would have just prod-tagged it, but want to make sure the community agrees. Speciate (talk) 01:45, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable company - fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Any claim to notability seems to be be one of inherited. Codf1977 (talk) 10:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.