Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spam (video games)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Glossary of video game terms. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Spam (video games)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Possibly failing WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Not a lot of notable coverage I can find, and most of it seems to indicate that its content could be adequately covered in other articles like Fighting games, or a definition in Glossary of video game terms, but I could be mistaken. For all the words in this article, it only has one citation (to an unreliable source). ~ Bluecrystal004 ( talk · contribs ) 13:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ~ Bluecrystal004 ( talk ·  contribs ) 13:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOTDICTIONARY. This information is interesting to gamers, yes, but it would a better fit on a pertinnt video gaming Wiki. TH1980 (talk) 02:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Glossary of video game terms where the term could be listed. Article itself fails WP:GNG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Games, Popular culture, Technology,  and Internet. silviaASH (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within)  13:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Glossary of video game terms per Zxcvbnm. silviaASH (User:BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4) (inquire within)  13:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge and trim appropriately to Glossary of video game terms where I am surprised to see it is entirely unrepresented. Jclemens (talk) 16:11, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge - Doesn't need it's own page, but this is exactly the sort of reason the glossary page was made. Sergecross73   msg me  21:53, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge per above, for failing GNG, with a note that due to having just a single footnote, we are merging just one sentence and redirecting this piece of OR. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.