Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spam Bully


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep Eluchil404 00:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Spam Bully
I was trying to clean this article up when another editor, User:MarkGallagher, deleted it speedily with the comment: "not an encyclopaedia article; arguably a copyvio". The deleted version probably was a copyvio and a bad article; the current one is not. I think it passes WP:CORP by virtue of independent coverage, although I hadn't heard of it before. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 08:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think it passes WP:CORP by virtue of independent coverage, although I hadn't heard of it before. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 08:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. (Liberatore, 2006). 12:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep I get 172,000 hits, including lots of reviews. Seems notable enough. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:30, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Seems notable enough. Kariià¦ Deranged Ramblings 20:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.