Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spam rage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:13, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Spam rage
Delete : I always thought this was supposed to be an encyclopedia rather than an extensive database for each and every self-explanatory neologism coined by attention-seeking journalists. Knight of the soundtable 14:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  [[Image:Monkeyman.png]]Monkeyman 14:19, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Thue | talk 14:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as rage-inducing spam. Logophile 15:04, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Logophile. Scoo 15:23, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Otherwise "rage" will become a suffix added to every noun and get a separate article, inducing Ragecruft Rage -- Ruby  15:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Possibly transwiki to Wikidictionary? JoshuaZ 15:43, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear WP:NOT violation. --Talain 11:25, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.