Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spamitising


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete G1 by User:Djsasso, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Spamitising

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A recently (i.e., yesterday) made-up word with little present currency. The author of the page removed a proposed for deletion tag, so I decided to send it here. ArglebargleIV (talk) 23:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons I prod'ed the article: Wikipedia is not for things made up one day, Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought -- pb30 < talk > 23:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Completely unworthy of an article. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 23:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete --Mud4t (talk) 00:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: this article is not only patent nonsense per WP:SD, I believe it qualifies as outright WP:vandalism worthy of immediate deletion per WP:SD as the page's creator has also resorted to obscenities on the article's talk page. Hence, I have tagged the main article as such. Mh29255 (talk) 01:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.