Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish Galleon, Greenwich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow keep. Only the nominator has offered a reason to delete, which didn't include reasoning and has been refuted by every other participant. Thryduulf (talk) 19:17, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Spanish Galleon, Greenwich

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable Hillelfrei   talk   01:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Hillelfrei   talk   01:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 02:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:36, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Grade II listed pub deemed notable due to national heritage listing. See the first point of WP:GEOFEAT. Philafrenzy (talk) 06:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Just so I don't make this mistake again, the article doesn't say anything about it being listed as a national heritage site. How do you know that?  Hillelfrei   talk   16:04, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It states, and always has, that it is grade II listed which links to listed building which is a type of national heritage classification. See also List of heritage registers. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:19, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Got it Hillelfrei   talk   21:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep Philafrenzy beat me to it - passes WP:GEOFEAT. And "non-notable" as one's entire deletion argument is particularly feeble. Edwardx (talk) 08:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Philafrenzy. The place meets WP:GEOFEAT. MarkZusab (talk) 13:44, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep clearly meets WP:GEOFEAT and claiming it as 'non-notable' clearly shows a poor understanding of our deletion and notability guidelines. Antila ( ✉ ) 07:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Right. I'll review relevant deletion and notability guidelines before starting another deletion discussion. Hillelfrei   talk   16:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's a grade-II listed building.  Enough said. Hog Farm (talk) 23:47, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as a listed building per WP:GEOFEAT. No good reason given in nomination in any case. You need more than a two-word opinion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:NBUILD, listed, nuff said. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:42, 14 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.