Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spanish Tutors Hong Kong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:58, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Spanish Tutors Hong Kong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Small tutoring service with no evidence of notability and no significant independent references. Of the four references provided, the first is a general article which does not mention this company; the second merely indicates that the company is listed by the local Chamber of Commerce; the third is a directory listing; and the fourth is the company's own website. Contested PROD. MelanieN (talk) 04:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Article re-edited and linked with cram schools in hong kong https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cram_schools_in_Hong_Kong If the majority considers that the article should be deleted no problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clerkchakrit (talk • contribs) 18:31, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. There are countless language tutorial centres in Hong Kong and I don't see anything that sets this one apart. Citobun (talk) 06:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Failed WP:GNG. STSC (talk) 06:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article on a small business with no evidence of notability. Could be a CSD A7. AllyD (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: If a company failed WP:N, it also usually have WP:NOTAD problem. --Thomas.Lu (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * (Note: I am moving this comment to the proper place in the discussion. --MelanieN (talk) 16:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC) ) This is the first and only Spanish language centre in Hong Kong that sends a tutor to your house and at the same time you can learn at their branch. Not sure if this is relevant enough. Also it is recognised by the Spanish Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong as an a Spanish language school to learn Spanish (the references have been updated and properly linked). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clerkchakrit (talk • contribs) — Clerkchakrit (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. The only independent coverage I can find is by the Spanish Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong, cited in the article. There isn't enough for notability. Deryck C. 22:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
 * SNOW Delete - Clearly not yet notable even generally and there's nothing yet for a better article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:08, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.