Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spank jazz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 02:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Spank jazz

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested Prod. Article is an unreferenced assertion of a genre founded on one track on an album by a defunct band. There is no Wikipedia page for the band or the album. No genre references on AllAboutJazz; only reference on Allmusic is the album track title itself. AllyD (talk) 15:59, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Note: Notified WikiProject Jazz. AllyD (talk) 16:13, 31 January 2010 (UTC) #
 * Delete - Genre isn't recognised by any leading music publisher, record label or record sales companies. Failing to see any notability as a genre. The band it's supposedly coined after isn't exactly notable, either. Regards, --— Cyclonenim | Chat 16:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NEO. Eddie.willers (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Not sure this exactly classes as a neologism; it seems to be more of a one off term coined by a non-notable band. I agree with the gist, though. Regards, --— Cyclonenim | Chat 18:19, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per nom, and remove link from . -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, as non-notable genre neologism, coined by some random band. Unit  Anode  21:46, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Richardrj talkemail 16:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:N, WP:V. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 09:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.