Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spark Networks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus (non-admin closure). Nom has retired, no support for nomination after 2 relists. -- Trevj (talk) 10:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Spark Networks

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable article. Almost no decent sources that I can find other than their website. Kumioko (talk) 22:58, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 17:00, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. It is easier to find coverage of the dating websites they own--especially JDate--but I did find a little bit of company-wide coverage in addition to the New York Times article already cited, notably an 2010 ABC News feature entitled "As Dating Pool Shrinks, Love Matches Grow".  There's also one from Canada.com  and smaller mentions such as .  (Some other possibilities on GNews are paywalled so I can't tell if the coverage is substantial.)  (Also, part of the searching difficulty may be that this company used to be called Match.net and ChristianMingle used to be called Relationships.com, which are both hard to search.)--Arxiloxos (talk) 20:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.