Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SparkleDB


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

SparkleDB

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There may be only one bit of press for this database application, a 2012 writeup on dataversity.net (used to be semanticweb.com); and I don't know how notable even that source is. Just as importantly, this application has apparently not actually been released - it was billed as coming out in 2013, but here we are in 2016 and the product page for it lets you sign up for a beta invite. Nonexistent and not otherwise notable. Yaron K. (talk) 00:22, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 13:39, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No credible indication of notability and the source isn't enough. KaisaL (talk) 00:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Poorly referenced software article of unclear notability. A single independent RS ref is insufficient to establish notability, and a search turned up no additional significant WP:RS coverage. The other ELs in the article are for similar technologies (ie SPARQL) but have no mention or direct connection to SparkleDB.Dialectric (talk) 05:29, 6 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.