Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparrow (2010 film) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 05:06, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Sparrow (2010 film)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Still non-notable film which is still to be released. Corvus cornix talk  02:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep To politely disagree with the nominator, the film had releases in Poland (Polish Horror Festiwal) and the US (Vermont International Film Festival) in October, 2010. The search parameter as set by the findsources above is useless. Looking to the article itself, one sees that it has enough genre coverage, specially for a non-US film, to meet WP:NF.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:34, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * What parts of Notability (films) does this film meet?  Corvus cornix  talk  03:51, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Being released and having significant coverage. Wikipedia does not expect nor demand that an independent horror film by a Polish filmmaker would have the same coverage as does big-budget highly-touted blockbusters.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:09, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * ...and yes, I opined a "keep or incubate" at the no-consensus keep AFD of last July as we had no reports of it being screened but production was getting coverage. With the expected release, that has now changed, and I can feel firmer in my keep this time around. It had coverage then, and has even more now.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:35, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Director
 * Producer
 * Actor
 * Actor
 * Actor
 * Actor
 * Actor
 * Actor
 * Actor
 * Actor
 * Actor
 * Writer
 * Writer
 * And yes... since opining, I have been addressing some of the article's issues per Film MOS, to fix reference formats and to make it more encyclopedic.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:32, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - erroneous nomination? Seems it has been released, and has been discussed in multiple sources, so I don't see the problem.--Kotniski (talk) 20:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.