Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spear closet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Closet. In light of the concerns expressed here about the sourcing, this leaves the possibility that a redirect be implemented instead if the sourcing turns out to be inadequate. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Spear closet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be a twelve-year-old hoax, or at least a very rarely used name without notability. I cannot find anything besides mirrors in Google search or Books, with the sole mention being a novel that post-dates the article. The article's supposed source Articles for deletion/Strategic and Tactical Planning of Corporate Facilities was apparently never published. Reywas92Talk 05:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Reywas92Talk 05:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge into closet which covers a variety of such tight spaces, such as a broom cupboard. Andrew D. (talk) 11:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, where's the source that suggests this is a real name? We shouldn't be putting made-up "slang" shit in that article. Reywas92Talk 22:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The person who created this says that they are an architect and their editing activity over many years seems consistent with this. There's not much on Google but I see enough to make me think that this is not a hoax, e.g. an inspector uses the phrase here. Andrew D. (talk) 00:34, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per WP:DICDEF - it exists but a real stub will not be created at this rate. Bearian (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak merge There's a feeble speckling of occasional uses on the net (once all the WP mirrors are sorted out) which at least shows the term exists. Whether the given source is of any use I don't know. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:24, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.