Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specdo (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  05:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Specdo
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article has previously been deleted (see Articles for deletion/Specdo). At present, notability guidelines likely have not been met given that the sources seem to be primary. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:01, 4 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion due to previous AfDs Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Nigeria.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: article feels rather promotional and the sourcing is fairly poor; sources used in the article seem to be literally the only sources that exist on him. Darling ☔ (talk · contribs) 14:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 16:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete No variety in sources. I agree with user Darling about the article being promotional only.  killer bee    05:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.