Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Special Needs Judo Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Special Needs Judo Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG Kleuske (talk) 13:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD: no indication of significance. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 13:54, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - A7 - Tagged as such as I can't find anything on it and article lists no sources either, Non notable judo club. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 15 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Not happy this was speedied and contested the speedy tag. The article makes claims for notability in organizing international events and certainly is more than just a judo club.  The main contributors have been notified with the hope that they can address the issues.   I see the case for delete but using find sources above demonstrates that something is there - I would like this AfD to run its course.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:09, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I found no significant coverage of this organization, just some mentions of some events it was sponsoring.Mdtemp (talk) 15:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources Identified [[User:CrazyAces489|CrazyAces489] (talk) 16:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * That's the Wikipedia for news in the Netherlands, everybody can contribute to that website. Sjoerd de Bruin  (talk)   16:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant independent coverage to show it meets WP:GNG. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete My internet search turned up no significant independent coverage of this organization and the article doesn't have a single reference for any of its claims. The bottom line is that I see no significant claims of notability or independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 20:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and there is no independent coverage.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.