Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specialist Application

Specialist Application was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

Orphan, contains nothing but a rather dubious dicdef. Does anybody see any potential for this article? I frankly don't -- Ferkelparade &pi; 11:33, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete fvw* 13:19, 2004 Nov 16 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dicdef in lucid but poor English, no useful content. Andrewa 14:13, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * What for this one? Obliterate should do it. Alphax (talk) 14:21, Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * Blah. Incomplete and pretty much useless. Delete. Inky 22:17, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.