Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spectra Wizard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Punkmorten 09:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Spectra Wizard
Non-notable band with no major album releases or significant tours. Google search of "Spectra Wizard" brings up zero relevant links. The band does not meet criteria set out in WP:MUSIC, and by extension is not verifiable and is likely comprised of original research and possibly vanity. --Wafulz 17:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Also nominating:
 * Circle of Vampyres --Wafulz 14:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn, OR, vanity and unverifiable. Molerat 22:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Baseball  Baby  08:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unverifiable, and fails WP:MUSIC anyways (there's no information on where their album was released, if at all, and Google is no help). Zetawoof(&zeta;) 16:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails notability tests. Akradecki 16:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No google hits and nothing at allmusic. :) Dlohcierekim 23:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The band is not even on Encyclopaedia Metallum. Prolog 11:31, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This article may be on a non-notable band but the information is valid, and is not false. I object for the deletion of this article, as I will make the information more relevant and simple. Also, Wikipedia is the only source that has this bands biography, that is why the information is not found on other sites. -Horowitz —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VmoSW (talk • contribs).
 * If the band is not notable, and there is no other information, that only cements the fact that it shouldn't be on here. Wikipedia is not a primary source of information. --Wafulz 20:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.