Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spectral Estimation of NMR Relaxation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Spectral Estimation of NMR Relaxation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prodded as "Rather obvious promotion of own research - author's sole contribution, username is the primary cited source spelt backwards." The prod was objected to by the author on the talk page, so I bring it here.

FWIW. note 3 on the talk page seems to relate to a different subject entirely.  DGG ( talk ) 20:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:22, 12 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Self-promotion of research that appears on the whole obscure. The first paper in the references has 9 GS citations, the second only 2 (since 1983!), the third 5, the fourth 43, and the fifth 47. Since neither of the latter two actually cite the Journal of Magnetic Resonance paper that supposedly established the article's subject, I suspect they were thrown in for padding. The final reference is to an OMICS journal and therefore counts for nothing. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 22:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete my understanding of that poorly-written article is that it is about numerical analysis of particular methods to analyze NMR outputs. This of course can explain the paper-padding. GScholar gives nothing (else) for keywords such as "spectral estimation"+"NMR relaxation". Tigraan Click here to contact me 17:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.