Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speculations

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. dbenbenn | talk 22:30, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Speculations
see also Kent Brewster

Doesn't seem very notable, probably vanity. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 06:12, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Week Delete. While the author seems to be notable, search for 'Speculations "Kent Brewster"' finds very few results. Speculations.com is the first Google hit out of one million for "Speculations", but that is probably because of the title match. Alexa doesn't seem to be working, but Google's What Links Here finds about 350 pages. &mdash; Asbestos | Talk 14:54, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep If the part about being up for Hugos seven times is correct, then it's notable. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 16:28, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, just passes notability test for me. Article needs expansion. Megan1967 00:29, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Samaritan 04:30, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand. The info about the Hugos is correct. Capitalistroadster 04:02, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. GRider\talk  22:16, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.