Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speed Dial (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Speed Dial (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Disambiguation page doesn't seem worthwhile: it's unlikely that anyone searching for "speed dial" is looking for a specific feature of the Opera web browser, or they would be searching for "Opera" or somewhere along those lines, and look through the sections. This specific feature of the web browser isn't notable enough to warrant an entry on a disambig, and I suspect it's named for the original "speed dial" anyway.  Giftiger Wunsch    [TALK]  22:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC) Delete: I'll stick the proper hatnote in speed dial right now. Buddy431 (talk) 17:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Creator answer
¬¬ I think users would come searching for Speed Dial not because of Opera (web browser), I thin they may come here by searching for http://speeddial.uworks.net/ or https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4810/ or https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/dgpdioedihjhncjafcpgbbjdpbbkikmi it's a very important feature introduced by Opera, please don't delete this page, it's really important. YES, I think users can come to Wikipedia to search and read about what it is... --Rafaelluik (talk) 19:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Since there are only two types of speed dial listed, disambiguation (if actually necessary) should be handled with a hatnote at the top of the the primary article, per wp:Disambiguation. » scoops “ 5x5  „ 20:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete A disambiguation page should generally exist if a.) There are two or more uses for a title other than the main use, or b.) there are two uses for a title in which neither one is more dominant than the other, in which case the title by itself is the disambiguation page. Otherwise, there is no need for one. Dew Kane (talk) 14:14, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is clearly a useless disambiguation page. It could easily be speedied with db-disambig, since it disambiguates just two topics and ends in "disambiguation".  Nyttend (talk) 17:35, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per db-disambig. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.