Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speedy Gonzales (Kumbia All Starz song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Skomorokh 01:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy Gonzales (Kumbia All Starz song)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

contested prod. no indication of how this meets WP:NSONGS RadioFan (talk) 02:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 04:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - There seems to be a lot of 3rd party coverage of this song as it relates to the release of a new Speedy Gonzales DVD, there are also a lot of mentions of it in the spanish press. From what babelfish translator says this appears to be non-trivial coverage. I don't speak spanish though and these things are notoriously unreliable. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 03:15, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. I personally don't see the point in a redirect due to the non-plausible nature of the title as a search term.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 05:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Chelo61 (talk) 22:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Why? MuZemike 02:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete: It was released as a single, however, it has failed to chart anywhere. I found this (English), but it is the only one that I found. talking  birds  15:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - If the song has received significant coverage in Spanish sources, that would be adequate to establish notability per WP:N, since notability isn't language specific. My Spanish is too weak to attempt such a search, so I am inclined to AGF on Panyd's assertion, although I cannot tell how significant the coverage is.  I did check the Spanish Wikipedia and not that they do not seem to have an article for this song, which doesn't necessarily mean it is non-notable, but I would have been much more comfortable !voting keep if I had evidence that Spanish Wikipedia considers it notable. Rlendog (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If this does not meet notability, I would not have a problem with a redirect, although in this case the parenthetical text would be awkward enough that I suspect User:Esradekan may be correct about a redirect for this having little value, but on the other hand, redirects are cheap. Rlendog (talk) 15:49, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Tim Song (talk) 00:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- Tim Song (talk) 00:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisting Comment: Wasn't sorted. Now sorted and relisted. Tim Song (talk) 00:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without references to show otherwise, individual songs fail notability. Miami33139 (talk) 01:15, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete on the basis of no references. WP:NSONG. Gosox5555 (talk) 01:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.