Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speiron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. with a side of salt. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:51, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Speiron

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no indication of notability. sole RS mention is in passing in a time magazine puff piece (insufficient for GNG, as the article is not substantially about the product). Unable to establish WP:N elsewhere. Won an award (from new york festivals), but upon further investigation this does not appear to be a notable award. [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 17:41, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

I also think it pertinent to point out that all of the significant edits to this page were carried out by SPAs, most of which appear to have also participated in the creation of articles about this company's olive oil (lambda, which has its own page) or about the "entrepeneur" behind this company (which has languished in AfC for some time as non-notable). since notability is not inherited, and i can see nothing about the company speiron itself (the time magazine article mention is clearly about the olive oil itself, not the company), i think (as the nominator) that it should probably be deleted. -- [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 18:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:23, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete and Salt Advert article. Completely fails WP:ORG. scope_creep talk 18:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - I found a few sources online, but can't be certain they are legit sources. Bearian (talk) 17:36, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * All i see there that could maybe be reliable sources are the Packaging Journal link and Journal du Net. Both of these are used in the Lambda (olive oil) article, also created by the same editor, and worked on almost solely by the same set of SPAs. They were close enough for notability for me to decide not to AfD the olive oil article, but they are both about the olive oil, and only mention Sperion in passing as the manufacturer. I would personally say that Sperion is not notable by itself, and does not deserve a separate article, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. -- [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 19:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt; personally, I consider this G11,but since it's here, let's dispose of it here. I did decide to nominate the article on the product for deletion at Articles for deletion/Lambda (olive oil)--the references are the same, the promotionalism the same, and the notability very similar. Attempting to get multiple articles for something submarginal is as ure sign or promotionalism.  The decision between a single article for a company and its principal product can be difficult (in general I prefer the company since it may have other products, unless a particular product is much better known), but in this case it's very simple: neither warrant an article.   DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.