Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spellbound (The Legend of the Ice People novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect as this week has shown this as consensus (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  05:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Spellbound (The Legend of the Ice People novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's all plot, it's unreferenced, and it's not notable. The 47-volume series has its own page and this book is listed there which seems sufficient. Dubbin u &#124; t &#124; c 15:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. st170e talk  15:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Legend of the Ice People. A redirect seems more appropriate here than a deletion, the subject itself I consider to be notable but the article as it is doesn't reflect that. I agree that the listing of the article at the main page is sufficient. st170e talk 15:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect has my support. Dubbin u &#124; t &#124; c 17:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Legend of the Ice People. I agree with the above reason. Aoba47 (talk) 23:55, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Legend of the Ice People looks like the sensible thing to do, i found this - "A mixture of myth and legend interwoven with historical events, this is an imaginative creation that involves the reader from the first page to the last.", but not enough for a stand alone article. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.