Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spelling of disc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep No consensus to delete or merge so a default Keep. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 23:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Spelling of disc

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't believe that the topic of this article is suitable to be included in Wikipedia. The article seems to be mostly a collection of information that is of historical and lexicographical interest but not notable or encyclopedic enough for an encyclopedia. CapitalSasha ~ talk 03:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge a shortened version to the top of disc and/or disk which both point to a DAB page. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable enough to be discussed in several on-line articles on the different etymologies and proper usages of the two variants. I have added a couple of sources to the article. Gandalf61 (talk) 12:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Since WP:INTERESTING is an argument to avoid, lets go with this: the article is derived from multiple non-trivial publications.  And its interesting.  ;-)  (jarbarf) (talk) 23:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to the top of disc. I have added a further source and cleaned out, probably unsourceable, speculation. It will now fit at the top of disc which would clarify why that page has alternate spelling. No objection to a straight keep, either, since it now has multiple, non-trivial sources per WP:N. Smile a While (talk) 03:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.