Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Barnett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Spencer Barnett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a musician, with no strong claim of notability under WP:NMUSIC and citing no reliable source coverage. The notability amounts to a single EP and claims of having worked with notable musicians in unspecified ways — but if the albums are going to be the notability then NMUSIC requires two of them, and a person does not inherit notability just because of who they've worked with. And the sourcing here is his own EPK, the iTunes sales page of his EP and a blurb on a non-notable music blog — so it's all either primary or unreliable, with no evidence of any coverage in real media shown. As always, Wikipedia is not a free advertising platform on which people who aspire to become notable in the future get to have an article now just because they exist — it's an encyclopedia, on which the notability and the media coverage have to already be there. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when enough coverage to support an article actually materializes. Bearcat (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom Gbawden (talk) 13:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete May achieve notability in the future, but may also fade into oblivion. Does not meet WP:NMUSIC at this time. Unable to find good sources for the label his EP is under: Mega Collider Records. Found in directories e.g. with most fields left blank. LaMona (talk) 21:54, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.