Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spencer Brown (runner)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Spencer Brown (runner)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable runner, fails WP:NTRACK. Bbarmadillo (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 17:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, he runs a successful YouTube channel and is a professional runner with a massive following in the running world who has broken 4:00-minutes in the mile, as the references confirm. He is significantly more notable a runner than most other people you find under the tag American Middle Distance runners and quite frankly even considering deletion is ridiculous. His YouTube channel has 60k subscribers and is rapidly growing. Efb21 (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, massively fails WP:SPORTCRIT. 60k followers isn't very impressive in an encyclopedic context. Geschichte (talk) 04:11, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 11:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:02, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete There's a lack of significant independent coverage to show that WP:GNG is met and he clearly fails to meet WP:NTRACK. Papaursa (talk) 23:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.