Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speridian Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G11, and it was quite speedy. (non-admin closure) Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 06:23, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Speridian Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

advertising The Banner talk 01:25, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as imho it is promotional. – Davey 2010 Talk 07:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Just one quick look at this article and you can tell it is promoting the company. DELETE. Also, it is not a well known company and we do not have a lot of sources. Sahibdeep Nann (talk) 22:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: many passing mentions, but the only coverage I could find from reliable sources is . There is also coverage from a website called "bizjournals.com", but they are not deep enough and the reliability is questionable (why is there so much coverage from that website; doesn't seem independent of the subject). If found notable, then stubify because the article is an advertisement masquerading as an article. Esquivalience t 00:31, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy. Speedily speedy delete the speedy Speridian Technologies advertisement per G11. And be speedy with it. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 05:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.