Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sperm Burp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 21:23, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Sperm Burp
Non-notable name for burping after fellatio. I couldn't verify it through casual Google search and didn't want to click on any search results. Delete; if verified would still be better to merge it. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-25 08:09Z 
 * NB - this vote is being vandalised by User:129.35.81.19, who keeps changing votes. Proto t c 15:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable nonsense. --Oscarthecat 08:18, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This article was requested at Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Medicine. It's easily verifiable as slang with a little research. . That said, maybe there's a good reason to delete the article ... -- Mikeblas 08:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The article request was added there four days before creation of this article by User:DigitalPimpette, the author of Sperm Burp. Kusma (討論) 16:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge?, although to me it sounds like a neologism... Jawz 08:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this neologism. Ugh. Grandmasterka 08:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete before I friggin' vomit. &mdash; simpatico hi 09:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Being a requested article doesn't mean the article should actually exist. Delete neologism. Proto t c 09:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism. --Terence Ong 11:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete disgusting term that gave some kids a few giggles to write up. Ruby 12:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Surely this ought to fall under some Speedy delete criteria. DreamGuy 13:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep it must happen, and someone musta called it summat! Jcuk 15:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Flapdragon 15:57, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; slang dictionary definition. - Liberatore(T) 16:16, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef slang. Kusma (討論) 16:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. -Rebelguys2 19:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 20:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this was already deleted once as nonsense but without AfD. There is absolutely nothing encyclopaedic to say about this: it is is a trivial and obvious neologism.  Tell me honestly, did you need to read the article to know what it was about?  It's utterly worthless. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 23:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fellatio-cruft. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  00:25, Jan. 26, 2006

Author defends her article
- This is not slang. If I wrote an article called blow job, this is slang for fellatio. There is no proper term for a sperm burp. If you know of a proper term for sperm burp, please share it, and I will gladly rewrite. - In defense of neologism, I would point out there are lots of subjects and terms on Wikipedia that fall under this category. At what point do we judge the newness of a term to no longer be new? - Personal opinions about the character and suitability are not descriminating factors in deletion. There are many articles on Wikipedia that could be offensive to people. - I did consider merging this article into burp, but I felt it should be kept seperate because of its sexual nature.

My vote is *Keep. DigitalPimpette 6:51 pm 1.25.2006
 * Delete - dicdef or neologism. -- DS1953 talk 03:08, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I say delete and transwiki to wiktionary.--Brian1979 15:00, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.