Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sperm stalker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BJ Talk 06:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Sperm stalker

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject of this article seems to be a neologism, apparently coined during a legal proceeding. I was unable to find any reliable sources unrelated to this legal case that define or even use this word as a legal or social definition of any woman other than the plaintiff in the above case. I conclude that this term is not and never has been notable anywhere outside that one specific legal proceeding when coined by the defendant's counsel. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOTE and WP:NEOLOGISM Themfromspace (talk) 19:30, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable neologism; appears to have only been used in regards to a single event; no evidence of wider use. OhNo itsJamie Talk 19:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. useful in context. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  20:03, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Dicdef (sorta, I doubt this would be in a Dictionary). –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  21:17, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Useful information, notable source. Braddaman1 (talk) 06:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ohnoitsjamie. -- SiobhanHansa 17:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - If it were a wellknown, properly sourced, mainstream expression I'd say keep. But it isn't and it's poorly sourced.   SIS   20:45, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The problem is with "Sperm Stalker is now used to describe a woman". Used by who? When? Without sources for this, the whole article is none notable, and should go.Yobmod (talk) 14:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.