Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpiderBabe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  00:31, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

SpiderBabe

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability. No reliable links come up on a Google search. Cleanliness (talk) 18:21, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Seems to pass WP:MOVIE with reviews and criticism such as Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep As Film Threat does not review hardcore porn, their review of the softcore parody is quite decent for commentary outside the hardcore genre. And to the nominator, and as these and other suitable coverage DID come up with a search, Film Threat, and Cincinnati Enquirer, and a whole slew of books, ARE suitable for sourcing the article. And Digitally Obsessed (time for a new article) has editorial oversite and offers independent reviews used to source many articles within the project.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:59, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.