Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider Player (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Spider Player
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Two years ago this software was at AfD and no consensus was the answer. It has not improved in the intervening two years. It isn't notable, doesn't make a claim to be notable. It has no references. There are a handful of external links to reviews, most of which are on user submitted sites or copies of PR. If the list of features was cut, there is no unique information to merge anywhere else. Wikipedia is not a software directory, and Wikipedia is not here to promote products uncovered by mainstream sources. Miami33139 (talk) 21:11, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:55, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per well-explained nom. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:31, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I have nothing more to add, there is no significant coverage.  JBsupreme (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.