Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider eater (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Spider eater (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable, cites only a primary source and a trivial mention. Was previously a redirect and then restored per Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 18 * Pppery * it has begun... 21:41, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable fictional creature. Of the two sources, one is a primary source, and the other is a piece of self-published fiction, which is very obviously not an acceptable source. Searches bring up essentially no substantial coverage in reliable, secondary sources. As it is such an incredibly minor creature, redirecting or merging it would not be appropriate in this case. Rorshacma (talk) 01:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or (preferred) redirect to whtever target User:BOZ feels is the best. I concur that this fails GNG at present. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:50, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Minor gamecruft, that is not notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and lacks any significant coverage. Since people were recently discussing whether to include a redirect, this is an unlikely search term and there is no point on WP:PRESERVEing it. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Belongs on Fandom instead of a professional encyclopaedia CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 19:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.