Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiffits


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per nom withdrawal. (WP:NAC) flaminglawyerc 17:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Spiffits

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I believe that this article is problematic for a number of reasons. The brand itself may not be notable - indeed, it appears that the product did not succeed on its own merits, although it is claimed that it was the first product of its type and that it may be notable for that reason. The sources given are not verifiable and reliable secondary sources. Richard Cavell (talk) 23:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. It seems to get a reasonable amount of coverage, especially in business/marketing texts. I agree the current article needs improvement, though. --Delirium (talk) 02:18, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Now, that's crushing. I didn't think to search Google Books. I'll have to withdraw my nomination on that basis. It seems as though it is an example product often used by business texts. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.