Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spike Breakwell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Spike Breakwell

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Sources are incredibly thin, article is largely the work of a WP:SPA who has written from obvious personal knowledge about this subject and subject's girlfriend, and nothing else. Guy (Help!) 23:22, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete nn  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! ) 23:35, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Breakwell appears to be an established figure, writing serious articles about disability for the Times as well as his more humorous contributions in the Sunday Times and Independent; also involvement in a BBC disability magazine programme. Article is adequately supported by references and an external link to some of Breakwell's articles. This article has been maintained and updated for over 4½ years by several editors. It appears to have been proposed for deletion by association with the recently created Lucy Soper article, whose deletion I support. -- Euchiasmus (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I agree with Euchiasmus, article does not immediatly violate WP:N, and may qualify under WP:BIO. Reportedly the subject of multiple upcoming films, it would definatly qualify for inclusion, if the films are released. Sephiroth storm (talk)
 * Keep. Notable for the writing and broadcasting. Itsmejudith (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep – Seems notable, but with gushing love POV. Also a stub. Tcrow777Talk 10:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.