Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiked Review of Books (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Spiked Review of Books
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The mere fact that a magazine has a book review section does not seem notable. None of the sources discuss it, at most they just mention it in passing. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete for going into indiscriminate detail. That's what website archives are for. - Mgm|(talk) 09:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. The article is an online index of the publication, an egregious violation of WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Third party references are trivial. • Gene93k (talk) 13:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful with the magazine article and Redirect as recommended in the previous AFD. 23skidoo (talk) 17:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete — Wikipedia is not your own webhost. MuZemike  ( talk ) 18:00, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:WEBHOST (Wikipedia is not your own webhost). JBsupreme (talk) 18:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect. Why was the redirect reverted at first place? -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.