Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spill Magic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Spill Magic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article reads like an advertisement and is sourced only by its own website, press releases, or closely related websites and directory-formatted websites. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 23:57, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 00:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Article does not pass WP:FAILN guideline threshold. This is self-promotion of the highest kind. Yet another of thousands of chemical cleaning concoctions without any nuance. This isn't nano-technology or something unique -- this is just another cleaner. -Ventric (talk) 19:17, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Hrodvarsson (talk) 22:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.